2D Motion Analysis of Knee Joint Angulation in Transtibial Amputees Using SACH Foot at Prosthetics and Orthotics Clinic, Polytechnic of Health Jakarta I

Authors

  • Kinanti Restiana Putri
  • Olle Hjelmström Exceed Worlwide, Sweden
  • Tri Riana Lestari Prosthetics and Orthotics Department, Polytechnic of Health Sciences Jakarta I, Indonesia
  • Atikah Adyas Public Health Department, Mitra Indonesia University, Lampung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36082/jpost.v1i2.869

Keywords:

transtibial, SACH foot, knee joint angulation

Abstract

The neutral foot position of the prosthetic SACH foot has a higher heel surface from the front of the foot (metatarsal line) with 1cm heel height. The prosthesis will be aligned to match the shoes that patient will use. When the patient is using shoes, the prosthetic SACH foot will be placed in a neutral position and will be supported by the shoe. When the patient does not use the shoe, the prosthesis will tilt backward especially when the foot is mid-stance and will force the pressure of the knee toward the extension of the knee joint which can cause damage to the knee joint structure. Therefore, knee joints will be measured at the time of the patient's use and not wearing shoes during mid-stance. Objective: To find out if there are significant differences in knee joint degree during mid-stance when using and not using shoes with 1cm heel height. Methods Quantitative comparative by observation of 2-dimensional motion in transtibial amputation patients using shoes and not using shoes with cross-sectional study design. Result : The degree of knee joints generated during mid-stance by patients with transtibial amputation when using shoes was 10.8o of flexion (p = 0.004) while at the time of not using the resulting knee boots was 4.5o of flexion (p = 0,000), normal degree of knee joint during mid- stance is 10o-20o of flexion. The results of paired t-test showed that there were significant differences in knee joint degree from standard degree, but when using the shoe showed a result of 0.8o larger than the lowest normal range while when not using shoes the resulting degree of 6.3o is smaller than lowest normal range.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Statistik B.P. (2015). Penyandang Disabilitas di Jakarta 6 Ribu Jiwa. Retrieved from databoks.co.id

Anderson, R., & Rustam, D. A. (2015). Beberapa Faktor Penyebab Disabilitas di Indonesia. Retrivied June 18, 2017, from http://life.viva.co.id/news/read/677542-beberapa-faktor-penyebab-disabilitas-di-indonesia

Smith, D. G. (2003). Transtibial Amputation Successes and Challenges. inMotion, 13(4), 57-63. Retrivied from http://www.prsresearch.org/Texts/InMotion/13-4document.pdf

Beurskens, R, Wilken, Jason M, & Dingwell, J. B. (2015). NIH Public Access, 47(7), 1675-1681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.02.033.Dynamic

Pinzur, M. S., Cox, W., Kaiser, J., Morris, T., Patwardhan, A., & Vrbos, L. (1995). Department of Veterans Affairs The Effect of Prosthetic Alignment on Relative Limb Loading in Persons with Trans-tibial Amputation : A Preliminary Report. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 32(4), 373-378. Retrivied from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2dcd/3f337704a2097b77b693fd0c4fdd6117f.pdf

Ripatti, M. (2015). Transtibial Prosthetics Course.

Pinzur, M. S., Cox, W., Kaiser, J., Morris, T., Patwardhan, A., & Vrbos, L. (1995). Department of Veterans Affairs The Effect of Prosthetic Alignment on Relative Limb Loading in Persons with Trans-tibial Amputation : A Preliminary Report. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 32(4), 373-378. Retrivied from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2dcd/3f337704a2097b77b693fd0c4fdd6117f.pdf

Salis, M. A. (2014). Gambaran Perbandingan Gaya Berjalan Pada Pasien Transtibial Menggunakan Prosthesis Dengan Sepatu, Sandal Jepit, dan Tanpa Alas Kaki di Klinik Ortotik Prostetik Tahun 2014.

Hansen, A. H., & Childress, D. S. (2009). Effects of Shoe Heel Height on the Roll-Over Shapes of Prosthetic Ankle-Foot Systems: Implications for Heel-Height-Adjustable Components, 21(1).

Colio, S. (2015). Understanding Knee Hyperextension. Retrieved June 20, 2017, from https://www.sports-health.com/sports-injuries/knee-injuries/understanding-knee-hyperextension

Fang, L., Jia, X., & Wang, R. (2007). Modeling and simulation of muscle forces of trans-tibial amputee to study effect of prosthetic alignment. Clinical Biomechanics, 22(10), 1125–1131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.07.017

Seymor, R. (2002). Prosthetics and Orthotics Lower Limb and Spine.

Whittle, M. W. (1996). Gait Analysis An Introduction (Second).

Whittle, M. (1991). Gait Analysis An Introduction (An Introdu, p. 70).

Cesario, C., Hubbard, J., Marella, L., & Knisely, S. (2017). Assessing the Reliability of Hudl Technique Software with SPORTSMETRICS(TM) Valgus Digitizer Software in Identification of High Risk" Female Soccer Players. Research, Innovation and Scholarship Expo.

Milbrath, M., Stoepker, P., & Krause, J. M. (2016). Video Analysis Tools for The Assessment of Running Effeciency. Track and Cross Country, 2(4). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308074208

Fell, D. W., & Wall, J. C. (2015). Using Mobile Devices to Document Objective Change in Function.

Downloads

Published

2022-11-18

How to Cite

Putri, K. R., Hjelmström, O., Lestari, T. R., & Adyas, A. (2022). 2D Motion Analysis of Knee Joint Angulation in Transtibial Amputees Using SACH Foot at Prosthetics and Orthotics Clinic, Polytechnic of Health Jakarta I. Journal of Prosthetics Orthotics and Science Technology, 1(2), 54–60. https://doi.org/10.36082/jpost.v1i2.869